Prediction of Salvatore Caruso [876th] vs Jeremy Jahn [894th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W W W L L
Form
W W L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Caruso 1 - 0 Jahn
They have played 3 sets in total, with Caruso winning 2 and Jahn winning 1. The last match between Caruso and Jahn was at the Ortisei Challenger, 10-11-2016, Second, I.hard with Salvatore Caruso getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Salvatore Caruso | 1 |
| Jeremy Jahn | 0 |
| Caruso | Stats | Jahn |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 876 | Ranking | 894 |
| 76 | Highest Rank | 197 |
| 32 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 12 |
| 54% (420-357) | Career Total W/L | 56% (305-243) |
| $927,160 | Career Prize Money | $2,285 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jeremy Jahn
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
4
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:59:1 | Average Match Time | 1:59:1 |
| 66% (63/96) | 1st Serve % | 56% (50/89) |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (35/50) |
| 55% (18/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (21/39) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 37% (33/89) | Return Points Win % | 36% (35/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Salvatore Caruso vs Jeremy Jahn Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Caruso 1 - 0 Jahn
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caruso has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jahn has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caruso, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jahn has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Caruso has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jahn has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Caruso has won 60% of matches played (W/L 3/ 2), with Jahn winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Caruso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 256/ 199), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 41/ 54). Jahn has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 229/ 170), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Caruso has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2), where as Jahn has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Caruso winning 1 times and Jahn being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Caruso winning 2 and Jahn winning 1. The last match between Caruso and Jahn was at the Ortisei Challenger, 10-11-2016, Second, I.hard with Salvatore Caruso getting the victory 6-2 4-6 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Caruso and Jahn have played a deciding set 1 times, with Caruso winning 1 times and Jahn 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Caruso winning 1, and Jahn 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caruso has played against opponents with an average rank of 361.4 while Jahn has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caruso has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jahn has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Caruso has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jahn has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Salvatore Caruso
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Paolini
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Fausto Tabacco
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Michele Ribecai
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Vito Dell'Elba
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Jahn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Jeremy Jahn
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Jeremy Jahn
49%
(
61 of
125)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
82)
42%
(
27 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Kai Wehnelt
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Jeremy Jahn
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Alec Deckers
52%
(
58 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
5
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
Player
Jeremy Jahn
89%
(
57 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
68
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Jasza Szajrych
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Jahn
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Caruso vs Jahn?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Caruso Vs Jahn is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (420/357) | Win/Loss | 56% (305/243) |
| 53% (954/863) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (702/552) |
| 51% (8787/8334) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6161/5494) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1514 | Aces Total | 1103 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1380 | Total Double Faults | 1349 |
| 1:21:3 | Average Match Time | 1:7:31 |
| 523.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 569.5 |
| 61% (25737/42403) | 1st Serve % | 59% (15815/26805) |
| 66% (17113/25737) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (10841/15815) |
| 50% (8378/16666) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5502/10989) |
| 43% (1882/4376) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1220/2777) |
| 40% (17293/42892) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10852/26405) |
| 54% (406/747) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (304/533) |
| 43% (9/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 46% (101/218) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (90/156) |
| 56% (135/242) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (78/168) |
| 87% (391/342) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (329/277) |
| 13% (391/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (329/49) |
| 20% (386/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (219/28) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
